USPTO serial 75753948
NBR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NBR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yongdungpo-gu, Seoul, KR
Yongdungpo-gu, Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Kolasch
JOSEPH A KOLASCH BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22010-4747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software for image capture and/or manipulating data for use with optical data storage, magneto-optical data storage or optically assisted magnetic data storage and manuals for use therewith, sold as a unit; audio/video recording and playback computer hardware and software for image capture and/or manipulating data for use with optical data storage, magneto-optical data storage or optically assisted magnetic data storage and manuals for use therewith, sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |