USPTO serial 75753996
MEASUREMITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEASUREMITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holly M. Ford
ASHLEY L BELLEAU PATRICK, MILLER, BURNSIDE & BELLEAU, LLCSTE 1680400 POYDRAS STNEW ORLEANS, LA 70130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | IMAGING AND SCANNING APPARATUS, NAMELY A CONTAINER MEASUREMENT DEVICE USED TO DETERMINE THE LEVEL OF LIQUIDS IN A VESSEL | ACTIVE | Jul 19, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEASUREMITE TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Quantum Imaging, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Quantum Imaging, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MEASUREMITE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |