USPTO serial 75754010
BILLS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BILLS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Antonio, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ted D. Lee
TED D LEE GUNN, LEE & KEELING700 N ST MARY 'S STSTE 1500SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the goods and services of others by placing advertisements and promotional displays in an electronic site accessible via a global computer information network | ACTIVE | Jul 26, 1999 |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing multiple-user access to computer networks for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information, including various financial data, stock market information, news information, and bill presentment and payment information and data; consulting and technical assistance in the field of designing, creating, hosting, maintenance, operating, managing, advertising, and marketing on-line commerce web sites | ACTIVE | Jul 26, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |