USPTO serial 75754172
HARMONIC RESONANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HARMONIC RESONANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bowling Green, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip M Rice
PHILIP M RICE EMCH SCHAFFER SCHAUB & PORCELLOONE SEAGATE STE 1980P O BOX 916TOLEDO, OH 43697-0916Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC ARTICLE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM COMPRISED OF EAS TOWERS, HANDHELD DETECTORS, TAGS, BULD ACTIVATORS AND DEACTIVATORS, AND ASSOCIATED SOFTWARE AND NETWORKING SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |