Drawing for PREMIUM SERIES

USPTO serial 75754245

PREMIUM SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREMIUM SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen M Westbrook

STEPHEN M WESTBROOK THE CLOROX COMPANY1221 BROADWAYOAKLAND, CA 94612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Touch up paint for barbecue grillsACTIVE—
003Degreasing composition preparations not used in manufacturing processes for use on barbecue grillsACTIVE—
008Barbecue utensils, namely, long handle forks, tongs, skewers and turnersACTIVE—
011Fitted barbecue grill covers and tops; barbecue rotisseries; lighters primarily for lighting grills, fireplaces, candles and barbecue lighting chimneysACTIVE—
021Barbecue and scrubbing utensils, namely, handheld scrubbers for grills, spatulas, basting brushes and grill cleaning brushes; cookware, namely, woks and wok coversACTIVE—
024Tablecloths not of paper; barbecue mittsACTIVE—
025ApronsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 20, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 3, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 29, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 21, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 25, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 30, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance