USPTO serial 75754348
E.DETAILING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, TAMI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E.DETAILING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Libertyville, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edwin A. Getz
EDWIN A GETZ GARDNER, CARTON & DOUGLAS321 N CLARK ST STE 3400CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES TO ENABLE PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURERS AND OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT PHARMACEUTICAL CARE TO HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR A LEASED LINE | ACTIVE | May 14, 1999 |
| 042 | ON-LINE COMPUTER SERVICES TO ENABLE PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURERS AND OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT PHARMACEUTICAL CARE TO HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR A LEASED LINE | ACTIVE | May 14, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |