Drawing for RILE

USPTO serial 75754382

RILE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RILE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lance J. Lieberman

LANCE J LIEBERMAN COHEN PONTANI LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 5TH AVE RM 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176-0091UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012APPARATUS IN THE NATURE OF PARTS AND COMPONENTS FOR LAND, SEA, AIR AND WATER VEHICLES, NAMELY, ENGINES FOR LAND VEHICLES; POWER TRANSMISSION BELTS AS PARTS OF ENGINES; AUTOMOTIVE PARTS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, ALLOY WHEELS, TIRES, LAND VEHICLE PARTS IN THE NATURE OF SHOCK ABSORBERS AND SPRINGS, AUTOMOTIVE EXHAUST PIPES, SHEET METAL IN THE NATURE OF HOODS, BRAKE LINES AND HOSES, SEATS, REAR VIEW MIRRORS, AND AXLES AND TRANSMISSION GEARSACTIVE—
037INSTALLATION OF PRODUCT MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLING MACHINES FOR OTHERS; SERVICING AND REPAIR OF PRODUCT MANUFACTURING AND ASSEMBLING MACHINES FOR OTHERS; MATERIAL TREATMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, METAL DRILLINGACTIVE—
040MANUFACTURE OF SPECIAL PURPOSE MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCT ASSEMBLING MACHINES TO THE ORDER AND/OR SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS; MANUFACTURE OF AUTOMATED ROBOTICS PRODUCT FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLING MACHINES TO THE ORDER AND/OR SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS; MATERIAL TREATMENT SERVICES FOR LAND VEHICLES, SHIPS AND AIRPLANES, NAMELY, MANUFACTURE, MACHINING AND ASSEMBLING OF METAL AND PLASTIC PARTS AND OF SUBASSEMBLIES OF METAL AND PLASTIC PARTS TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS; MANUFACTURE OF METAL AND PLASTIC PARTS, COMPONENTS, AND SUBASSEMBLIES FOR LAND VEHICLES, SHIPS AND AIRPLANES TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS; MATERIAL TREATMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, METAL CUTTING, METAL CASTING, METAL PLANTING, WELDING AND SHAPING IN THE NATURE OF GRINDING AND MILLING; MATERIAL TREATMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, MILLING AND GRINDING; CONSTRUCTION OF SPECIAL PURPOSE MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCT ASSEMBLING MACHINES FOR OTHERS; CONSTRUCTION OF AUTOMATED ROBOTICS PRODUCT FABRICATION AND ASSEMBLING MACHINES FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 23, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 25, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 23, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 27, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 19, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 29, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance