USPTO serial 75754630
EA$YTAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 26, 2007
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with EA$YTAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toluca Lake, CA, US
Toluca Lake, CA, US
Toluca Lake, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo, Esq.
Daniel M. Cislo, Esq. CISLO & THOMAS LLP12100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1700Los Angeles, CA 90025-7103UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BUDZICHOWSKI, ALLEN J
- Other trademarks owned by BUDZICHOWSKI, ALLEN J
- Other trademarks owned by BUDZICHOWSKI, ALLEN J
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named EA$YTAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 6, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 6, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 30, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 22, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |