Drawing for MP3ATLANTA

USPTO serial 75754812

MP3ATLANTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MP3ATLANTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ERIN M. FALK

ERIN M FALK SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHALP O BOX 061080WACKER DR STA SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing on-line magazines, newsletters, directories and books in the field of music, entertainment, arts and culture, videos, motion pictures, film, radio, television, news, current events, health and lifestyles, and sporting events; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network in the field of music, entertainment, arts and culture, videos, motion pictures, film, radio, television, news, current events, health and lifestyles, and sporting events; providing on-line computerized databases in the field of arts and culture, news, current events, and health and lifestylesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 1, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 30, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance