USPTO serial 75754825
MP3SANFRANCISCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MP3SANFRANCISCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIN M. FALK
ERIN M FALK SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHALPO BOX 061080WACKER DR STA SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing on-line magazines, newsletters, directories and books in the field of music, entertainment, arts and culture, videos, motion pictures, film, radio, television, news, current events, health and lifestyles, and sporting events; providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network in the field of music, entertainment, arts and culture, videos, motion pictures, film, radio, television, news, current events, health and lifestyles, and sporting events; providing on-line computerized databases in the field of arts and culture, news, current events, and health and lifestyles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |