USPTO serial 75754883
VEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
45100 Rovigo Italy, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LYNN A SULLIVAN
LYNN A SULLIVAN LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER LTD2 PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900180 N STETSONCHICAGO, IL 60601-6780Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Cosmetic and cleaning preparations for the treatment of skin conditions, namely medicated shavings preparations, medicated after shave lotions, shaving soaps, medicated deodorant, medicated bath crystals, medicated bath foams, medicated bath gels, medicated bath powder, medicated cleansing milk and medicated skin creams for dermatological use; medicated lotions for the skin, the body and the feet medicated household deodorants, medications personal deodorants, medicated depilatory preparations, medicated suntanning preparations, and hydrophobic and hydrophobic gels and emulsions for the face and body for the treatment of skin conditions, medicated shampoos for pets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |