USPTO serial 75754956
TESTFRAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 18, 2005
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TESTFRAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
1183 AV, Amstelveen, NL
1183 AV, Amstelveen, NL
1183 AV, Amstelveen, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Hastings
James R. Hastings Practus, LLP100 South Bedford Road, Suite 328Mount Kisco, NY 10549United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [Based on Section 44e] Computer software, namely, recorded computer operating programs and recorded computer programs, all for testing new and adapted automated computer systems, for organizing and structuring test processes for new and adapted automated computer systems and for analyzing the functionality of new and adapted automated computer systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | [Based on Section 44(e) and Use] Business advice and consultancy for buying and trading automated computer systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [Based on Section 44(e) and Use] TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, EMAIL OR BY OTHER ELECTRONIC MEANS OR IN PERSON; DESIGN AND TESTING OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMATION, NAMELY, TESTING NEW AND ADAPTED AUTOMATED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTER DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMATION, NAMELY, DRAWING UP AND COMPOUNDING STANDARDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF TEST PROCESSES FOR NEW AND ADAPTED AUTOMATED COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTIONALITY AND TEST PROCESSES FOR NEW AND ADAPTED AUTOMATED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY IN THE FIELD OF FUNCTIONALITY, CHOICE, AND USE OF AUTOMATED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS AND UPDATING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CMG Nederland B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CMG Nederland B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CMG Nederland B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TESTFRAME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |