Drawing for DIGITAL POWERHOUSE

USPTO serial 75755107

DIGITAL POWERHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2481420Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 28, 2001
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL POWERHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carole E. Klinger

Carole E. Klinger Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP1177 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation and business marketing consulting services; [ referral services, namely, providing information via global computer network regarding on-line retail store service of others; ] providing business information and market data for other in the field of the world wide web marketplaceEXPIREDOct 5, 1998
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; [ COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE MASS AUDIENCE PUBLICATION IN THE FIELD OF INTERNET, DESIGN AND NEW YORK LIFESTYLE ]EXPIREDOct 5, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2014CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Dec 15, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Dec 15, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 15, 2008CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Sep 26, 20078.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Sep 11, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 28, 20078.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Aug 28, 2007ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 27, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2007PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 5, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 28, 2001R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 5, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 23, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 16, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance