Drawing for NEOLINK

USPTO serial 75755245

NEOLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NEOLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony R. Barkume

ANTHONY R BARKUME14 S MAIN STSTE 200SAYVILLE, NY 11782

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN GENERATING HUMAN-READABLE CODES AND MACHINE-READABLE SYMBOLS AND TRANSLATING SUCH CODES AND SYMBOLS INTO HUMAN-READABLE FORM FOR USE IN LINKING TO SITES ON LOCAL AREA COMPUTER NETWORKS, WIDE-AREA COMPUTER NETWORKS, AND THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH OPTICAL SCANNERS FOR READING HUMAN-READABLE CODES AND MACHINE-READABLE SYMBOLSACTIVE—
016machine-readable and human-readable indicia associated with a data carrier and suitable for carrying encoded data useful for providing access to host computers interconnected to a computer networkACTIVE—
035ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING PRINT ADVERTISEMENTS AND PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE OPTICALLY ENCODED WITH HUMAN-READABLE CODES AND MACHINE-READABLE SYMBOLS WHICH, WHEN READ WITH AN ELECTRONIC SCANNING DEVICE OR WHEN MANUALLY ENTERED BY THE USER ON A PERSONAL COMPUTER KEYBOARD, DIRECT THE USER TO THE ADVERTISER'S SPECIFIED SITES ON THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance