USPTO serial 75755913
MICALM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICALM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LONDON, W1Y 6LN, GB
LONDON, W1Y 6LN, GB
LONDON, W1Y 6LN, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. John Campaign
H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM CAMPAIGN36 W 44TH ST STE 1300NEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS AND SUBSTANCES FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF DISEASES AND DISORDERS OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AND THE CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS AND SUBSTANCES FOR PAIN CONTROL AND ANAESTHESIA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZENECA LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ASTRAZENECA UK LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named MICALM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |