USPTO serial 75756030
VALUE CHARTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VALUE CHARTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | accounting services; business and account auditing services; tax preparation and consulting services; provision of business information in the fields of accountancy, tax and economic trends and practices; business management and consulting services; and business management consulting services in the field of information technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | financial management and consulting services and provision of financial information, in the field of investments and taxation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | development, planning, design, programming and implementation of computer software systems for others in the field of business and economic trends and practices; and maintenance of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ernst & Young
- Other trademarks owned by Ernst & Young
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VALUE CHARTER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |