USPTO serial 75756248
BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THE HUMAN HAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THE HUMAN HAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE D KAHN
MICHELLE D KAHN SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR LBBY 17SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | COMPUTERIZED SURGICAL MANIPULATION SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF SURGEON'S CONSOLE, MASTER CONTROL, IMMERSIVE VIDEO DISPLAY, SURGICAL MANIPULATION SYSTEM SOFTWARE AND INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS PROVIDED AS A UNIT, PATIENT-SIDE CART WITH SET-UP ARMS AND MANIPULATOR SLAVE ARMS, STERILE ADAPTORS TO CONNECT ARMS TO INSTRUMENTS, AND A FULL LINE OF REPOSABLE LIMITED RE-USE TOOLS NAMELY, LAPAROSCOPES, ENDOSCOPES, TROCARS, CANNULAS, CUTTERS, CLAMPS, ELEVATORS, GOUGES, KNIVES, SCOPE PREHEATERS, ELECTROSURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, ELECTROCAUTERY INSTRUMENTS, LASER INSTRUMENTS, ULTRASOUND INSTRUMENTS, LENS CLEANING, SCRUB AND BIOPSY BRUSHES, CLIP APPLIERS AND CLIPS, TACK APPLIERS AND TACKS, APPLICATORS, LIGATURE CARRIERS/NEEDLE HOLDERS, CLAMPS/HEMOSTATS/GRASPERS, CURETTES, INSTRUMENT GUIDES, LIGATURE PASSING AND KNOTTING INSTRUMENTS, NEEDLES, RETRACTORS, SNARES, STYLETS, FORCEPS, DISSECTORS, CALIPERS, SCISSORS, SUCTION/IRRIGATION PROBES, STERILE DRAPES, HEMOSTATS, AMPUTATION HOOKS, OSEOTOMES, SAWS, RETAINERS, SUTURING APPARATUS, MEASURING TAPES, CHISELS AND CONTRACTORS, FILES, SKIN GRAFT EXPANDERS, LANCETS, MALLETS, PLIERS, HAMMERS, RASPS, SPATULAS, AND STRIPPERS; A FULL LINE OF FDA CLASSES I AND II EXEMPT SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, SCALPELS, SCALPEL BLADES AND HANDLES, STAPLERS, TACKERS, CLIP APPLIERS, ELECTROCAUTERY TOOLS, FORCEPS, NEEDLE HOLDERS, GUIDES AND DRIVES, GRASPERS, AND KITENERS | ACTIVE | May 6, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THE HUMAN HAND
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |