Drawing for FRENCH OPEN

USPTO serial 75756435

FRENCH OPEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSBORNE, STANLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRENCH OPEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jess M. Collen

JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATES, PCTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEWESTCHESTER COUNTY, NY 10562

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter, namely books, magazines, periodicals in the nature of newsletters and newspapers all in the field of sports; posters; photographic, stamp and scrapbook albums; calendars, catalogs in the field of the sports, clothing, and fine leather goods; unmounted and mounted photographs; stationery, envelopes, fountain pens, writing instruments, pencil holders, and pen casesACTIVE—
041Education and entertainment services, namely publication of books, newspapers and magazines; entertainment in the nature of tennis games; arranging and conducting athletic competitions; providing incentives to people to demonstrate excellence in the field of athletic competitions by issuing awards and trophies; entertainment in the nature of an ongoing radio and television program in the field of sports; motion picture film production; modeling for artists; rental of cinema films and motion picturesACTIVE—
042Written text editing of books, newspapers, and magazinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 18, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 9, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 27, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 27, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 25, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 1, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 19, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance