USPTO serial 75756455
ASPENQUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASPENQUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L White
ADRIENNE L WHITE BURNS DOANE SWECKER & MATHIS LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATABASE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR GENERAL USE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR STORAGE OF IMAGES, FULL-TEXT AND FIELDED DATA AS A DATABASE, AND FOR DATABASE MANIPULATION, SEARCHING AND RETRIEVAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, CUSTOM DESIGN OR CREATION OF DATABASES FOR OTHERS; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER DATABASE SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; AND ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE SEARCH SERVICES FOR OTHERS, IN A VARIETY OF FIELDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aspen Systems Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Aspen Systems Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ASPENQUEST
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |