Drawing for CRISPY MELT CANOE

USPTO serial 75756521

CRISPY MELT CANOE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2590249Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 9, 2002
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRISPY MELT CANOE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030SANDWICHESSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDApr 15, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2007C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Mar 29, 2007CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 23, 2007CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Nov 14, 2006PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 9, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance