USPTO serial 75756617
TUM-YUMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TUM-YUMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen M. Evans
STEPHEN M EVANS GRAYBEAL JACKSON HALEY LLP155 108TH AVE N ESTE 350BELLEVUE, WA 98004-5901Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Confectionery products, namely candy coated nuts, candy coated black beans, candy coated mini cookie balls, and herbal chewing gums | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |