Drawing for SDM

USPTO serial 75756871

SDM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SDM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chris Wilson

JAMES WALSH IP DOCKETINGARNOLD & PORTER555 TWELFTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009BLANK SOUND AND VIDEO RECORDINGS; CONSUMER ELECTRONIC DEVICES, NAMELY COMPACT DISCS, DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS, MP3S AND PERSONAL COMPUTERS FOR RECORDING, PLAYING AND TRANSMITTING SOUND AND VIDEO; COMPUTERS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES, NAMELY, TELEPHONES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RECORDING, PLAYING AND TRANSMITTING SOUND AND VIDEO IN THE BROADCAST INDUSTRY; TELEPHONE, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, AUDIO AND VIDEO RECEIVERS; TELEPHONE, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, AUDIO AND VIDEO TRANSMITTERS; SATELLITE DISHES, TELEVISIONS, SET-TOP BOXES FOR TELEVISIONS, CAR RADIOS, RADIOS AND MODEMS THAT CONFORM TO SPECIFICATIONS ISSUED BY THE APPLICANT DESIGNED TO LIMIT OR PRECLUDE THE UNAUTHORIZED COPYING OF MATERIAL PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHTACTIVE—
038telecommunications services, namely, transmission of sound and video via wire, terrestrial wireless and satellite networks in digital form through the use of computers, radios and televisions all conforming to the specifications issued by the applicantACTIVE—
042association services, namely, promoting the interests of the owners of copyrights in recorded music through the development and adoption of a voluntary digital security specification that provides an open and interoperable way to protect copyrighted music in all existing and emerging digital formats and through all delivery channelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 9, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance