Drawing for BONSMARA

USPTO serial 75756882

BONSMARA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BONSMARA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay Lyn Schwartz

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE & WYNNE LLP1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Live animals, namely, beef cattleACTIVE—
042Cattle breedingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 6, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 6, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 6, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 23, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance