Drawing for SATIN & LACE

USPTO serial 75757026

SATIN & LACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAUTERBACH, JODI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SATIN & LACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Cox

WILLIAM H COX JANVEY GORDON HERLANDS RANDOLPH ET AL355 LEXINGTON AVE FL 10NEW YORK, NY 10017-6603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Comic books, mounted and unmounted photographs, posters, souvenir program books featuring information about a musical group and wrestlers, greeting cards, decals, heat transfers, bumper stickers, and fan club kits comprising informational brochures about a musical group and wrestlers, pre-printed paper fan club award certificates and souvenir decals sold as a unitACTIVE
028Toys, namely dolls and action figuresACTIVE
041Entertainment in the nature of wrestling exhibitionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 14, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 10, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 31, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 1, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 17, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 27, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 17, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 3, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 9, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 17, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 21, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance