USPTO serial 75757335
AUTODESORB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2637524Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 2002
- Examiner
- BRUNO, JAMES
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTODESORB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN J. KANE
JOHN J KANE SPERRY, ZODA & KANESTE D ONE HIGHGATE DRTRENTON, NJ 08618UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | Scientific instrument for automatically introducing thermal desorption samples into a gas chromatograph | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2005 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |