USPTO serial 75757375
LECTROTHERM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LECTROTHERM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Canton, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A. SEBOLT
JOSEPH A SEBOLT SAND & SEBOLTASTON PARK PROFESSIONAL CTRSTE 194 480L DRESSLER RD N WCANTON, OH 44718Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | INDUCTION FURNACE COILS, CHANNEL INDUCTION FURNACES, COMPOSITE BOX FURNACES, CORELESS FURNACES, CORELESS INDUCTION COILS, ELECTROMAGNETIC STIRRING UNITS, ELECTROMAGNETS, POWER CABLES FOR INDUCTION MELTING AND HEATING, WATER COOLED POWER CABLES AND TRANSFORMER CORDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | PRECAST REFRACTORY SECTIONS AND LININGS AND LAMINATED SHUNTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | SERVICE OF REBUILDING AND REPAIRING INDUCTION COILS, FURNACES, ELECTRIC LIFTING MAGNETS, COMPOSITE BOX FURNACES, ELECTROMAGNETIC STIRRING UNITS, CHANNEL FURNACES, CORELESS INDUCTION COILS, EAF POWER CABLES, AND WATER COOLING SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |