Drawing for NEXT ELECTRONIX

USPTO serial 75757741

NEXT ELECTRONIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXT ELECTRONIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. Rabkin

RICHARD M RABKIN245 DELAWARE STWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028house mark for toys, namely plush toys with synthetic speech; plush toys containing electronic components allowing the toys to interact with children; combined toy electronic recording, playback, and radio systems with or without removable information storage; toys including radio systems; and toy radio controlled vehicles; and for games, namely board games; hand-held, table-top, key-chain, electronic games with liquid crystal displays and/or synthetic speech, or both, and game software cartridges therefor; hand-held manipulative games; and electronic educational parlor gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance