Drawing for MAGIC BUBBLE

USPTO serial 75757844

MAGIC BUBBLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGIC BUBBLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J. HUGHES

MICHAEL J HUGHES IPLO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICES1901 S BASCOM AVE STE 660CAMPBELL, CA 95008UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Communications systems for wireless transmission and reception of digital data and analog data inside residential and commercial structures; comprising radio frequency devices, namely, wireless radio receivers and transceivers, namely, combined transmitters and receivers, for wireless computers, telephones, pagers and satellite or terrestrial telecommunications systems using radio frequency components, namely, antennas, exciters, amplifiers, mixers, oscillators, detectors, couplers, filters, equalizers, attenuators, modems, modulators and de-modulators; antennas and probes for near and far electrical and magnetic field measurement or detection, namely, loop, patch dipole, monopole, crossed dipole, spiral, helix, conical, horn, slot, microstrip, multiple-antenna arrays, and lenses; digital hardware devices, namely, wireless telephones, radio pagers, computer peripherals, namely, printers, scanners, monitors, keyboards, keypads, and facsmilie machines; computer fax and modem cards, personal digital assistance, timers, entertainment units, namely, televisions, radios, tuners, amplifiers, audio tape and cassette recorders and players, compact disc players and recorders, digital video and versatile disc players and recorders, digital audio players and recorders; remote control units for radio frequency, and digital hardware devices, digital components of household and office appliances and sensors, namely, temperature thermostats and perimeter, intrusion, burglar, smoke and temperature alarms; computer software for operation and control of radio frequency and digital hardware devices, namely, operating programs for remote control, audio, video, communications and messages, alarms and alerts, application programs for data recording and database management, on-line network assistance, network monitoring, video and audio news and entertainment, game programs, and software programs for controlling household and office appliances and sensors, namely, temperature thermostats, ovens, refrigerators, washing machines, dryers, televisions, radios, copying machines, facsimile machines, and perimeter, intrusion, burglar, smoke and temperature alarms for home and building management, network communications and communications with external communications systems; and network interface devices, namely, interface units without microprocessors or computers, namely, communications hubs, servers, bridges, routers, firewalls, radio frequency converters, serial or parallel data interfaces, namely, computer interface boards for digital or analog data exchange with external systems and operation and control of radio frequency and hardware devices, namely, programs for remote control, audio, video, communications and messages, alarms and alertsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 3, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 12, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 10, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 10, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 28, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 28, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 11, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance