USPTO serial 75757857
ARC KNOWLEDGE SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARC KNOWLEDGE SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Hartman
ANDREW HARTMAN SACHNOFF & WEAVER, LTDSTE 290030 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA, VIDEO AND DATA COMMUNICATION, IMAGES, AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES OVER FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS, INCLUDING TELEPHONE, TELEVISION, AND ELECTRONIC INFORMATION, INTERNET AND INTRANET ACCESS; ELECTRONIC MAIL, VOICE MAIL AND MESSAGING SERVICES OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AUDIO AND VIDEO TELECONFERENCING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC FILE TRANSFER SERVICES OVER GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; VIRTUAL NETWORK TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL NETWORK (ISDN) TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; AND CONSULTING, ADVISORY AND INFORMATION SERVICES RELATING TO THE FOREGOING | ACTIVE | Aug 18, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |