USPTO serial 75757901
MIJOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIJOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELVILLE OWEN
NOEL M COOK OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST FL 19SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2420UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of animation; theatre productions; production and distribution of motion picture films | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2007 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |