CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SURGASSIST

USPTO serial 75757998

SURGASSIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SURGASSIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory P. Gulia

Gregory P. Gulia DUANE MORRIS LLP1540 BroadwayNEW YORK CITY, NY 10036-4086UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Disposable latex gloves for surgical and medical useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 1, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 31, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 1, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 9, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance