USPTO serial 75758112
AMERLUX LIGHTING SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 30, 2001
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMERLUX LIGHTING SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FAIRFIELD, NJ
Fairfield, NJ
Fairfield, NJ
Fairfield, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELISSA L. KLIPP
MELISSA L. KLIPP DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP500 CAMPUS DRIVEFLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Custom manufacture of electrical lighting systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 8, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERLUX, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Amerlux, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Amerlux, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Amerlux, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named AMERLUX LIGHTING SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 29, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2007 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |