USPTO serial 75758356
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
69580 Sathonay Camp, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Yates Dowell, III
A YATES DOWELL III DOWELL & DOWELLSTE 3091215 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | HEATING APPARATUS, NAMELY, THERMAL GENERATORS WHICH ARE RADIANT PANELS THAT GENERATE INFRARED AND CONVENTIONAL ENERGY AS A RESULT OF CATALYTIC COMBUSTION OF LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS FOR INDUSTRIAL USE | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1982 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |