USPTO serial 75758716
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne Yeung
LARA PEARSON ESQ LAW OFFICE OF LARA PEARSON LTD774 MAYS BLVD STE 10PMB 405INCLINE VILLAGE, NV 89451| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting and management services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 28, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |