USPTO serial 75758940
ZEROSHIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZEROSHIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Davis
PAUL DAVIS WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL INTERFERENCE COATINGS INCLUDING THIN FILM OPTICAL INTERFERENCE COATINGS AND ANTI- REFLECTION OR POLARIZATION COATINGS ON PASSIVE COMPONENTS TO FILTER LIGHT TRANSMISSION ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS PRODUCTS INCLUDING INCLUDING LASERS, DENSE WAVELENGTH DIVISION MULTIPLEXERS, WAVELENGTH DIVISION MULTIPLEXERS, AND THE LIKE; FILTERS, NARROW BANDPASS FILTERS, NARROW BAND FILTERS, LONG WAVE PASS FILTERS, SHORT WAVE PASS FILTERS, TELEMETRY FILTERS, GAIN EQUALIZATION FILTERS, GAIN FLATTENING FILTERS, WIDEBAND FILTERS,AND THE LIKE; AND ERBIUM DOPED FIBER AMPLIFIERS; AND RAMAN SHIFTED AMPLIFIERS | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |