Drawing for PLANET KID

USPTO serial 75759104

PLANET KID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PLANET KID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John R. Long

JAMES R EASTHOM KENNON, CRAVER, BELO, CRAIG & MCKEE PLL4011 UNIVERSITY DR STE 300DURHAM, NC 27707UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035promoting the goods and services of retail businesses through a membership club that provides member children with newsletters, events and discounts at participating retail businessesACTIVEOct 28, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 24, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 29, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 20, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance