USPTO serial 75759194
TRI-FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRI-FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BLACK DIAMOND COMMERCIAL FINANCE, L.L.C.
LAKE FOREST, IL
Other trademarks owned by BLACK DIAMOND COMMERCIAL FINANCE, L.L.C.
VERONA, VA
Verona, VA
VERONA, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee N Kump
LEE N KUMP MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE AND BOOTHE, LLPONE JAMES CTR901 E CARY STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | RAZORS AND RAZOR BLADES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BLACK DIAMOND COMMERCIAL FINANCE, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN SAFETY RAZOR COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by American Safety Razor Company
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN SAFETY RAZOR COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named TRI-FLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |