USPTO serial 75759379
VITEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2002
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VITEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sinphar Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Tung-Shan Shine, Yei-Lan Hsien, TW
Sinphar Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Tung-Shan Shine, Yei-Lan Hsien, TW
Sinphar Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Tung-Shan Shine, Yei-Lan Hsien, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce H. Troxell
Bruce H. Troxell Troxell Law Office PLLC5205 Leesburg PikeSuite 1404FALLS CHURCH, VA 22041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Soft candy; fruit candy; ginseng sweets, namely candy made with ginseng, cookies made with ginseng; coffee; tea; Ice-cream; preparations made from cereals, namely, breakfast cereals, cereal based snack foods, ready to eat cereal derived food bars; and royal jelly | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sinphar Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sinphar Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sinphar Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named VITEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |