USPTO serial 75760378
RXDDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RXDDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WARREN M HAINES II
WARREN M HAINES II CALFEE HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP800 SUPERIOR AVE STE 1800CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2688UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for use in database management for health care professionals and patients | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |