USPTO serial 75761159
CAB CALLOWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAB CALLOWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia Johnson Walden; Anthony L. Fletcher; Timothy A. French; Mark A. Fischer; John T. Williams; Patricia A. Nelson; Debra S. Serota, Nicole E. Gage; Amy L. Brosius
Marc A. Karlin Karlin & Karlin, APLC3701 Wilshire Blvd.Suite 1035Los Angeles, CA 90010Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail stores, retail outlets and on-line retail store services featuring compact discs, records, video tapes, cassettes, digital video and audio discs, and other home entertainment related products; distribution of pre-recorded comedies, musicals and dramas on video tapes, cassettes, digital video and audio discs, CD-ROM; distribution of pre-recorded theatrical musicals, comedies and dramas on video tapes, cassettes, digital video and audio discs, CD-ROM; and distribution of pre-recorded music, drama, comedy and variety shows on video tapes, cassettes, digital video and audio discs and CD-ROM | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of multimedia entertainment software production services, scheduling of programs on a global computer network; production and distribution of live music concerts, comedy, and dramatic series; production of live music concerts and live theatrical plays; production of radio and television programs; production of videotapes and sound recordings, namely, phonograph records, pre-recorded audio tapes, compact discs, videotapes, digital audio tapes, compact disc videos, and laser discs; production and distribution of motion pictures; production of comedies, musicals and dramas; scheduling television and radio programming; production of music, drama, comedy and variety shows; theatrical production of musicals, comedies and dramas | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CREATIVE ARTS BY CALLOWAY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CREATIVE ARTS BY CALLOWAY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Calloway, Zulme M.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CAB CALLOWAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 31, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |