USPTO serial 75761519
GRIDIRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRIDIRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | football based board game | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |