USPTO serial 75761647
F FACES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with F FACES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BRIDGETOWN, BB
Toronto, Ontario M4P 1E4, CA
CONCORD, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AARON B KARAS
LINDA S CHAN KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSENMANINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPT575 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-2585Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, nail enamel, cuticle lotion, eye masks, false eyelashes, eye shadow, eyeliner, lipstick, lip gloss, mascara, concealer, foundation, pressed facial powder, loose facial powder, blush, hair mascara, lip pencils, eyebrow pencils, skin bronzing products,namely, lipsticks, eye shadows, lotions and creams; personal care products namely skin lotions, foot lotions, skin moisturizers, skin cleansers, exfoliating scrubs, shower gels, bubble baths, bath beads, non-medicated bath salts, sun protection lotions, sunless tan sprays, skin creams; toiletries, namely bath soaps, deodorants for personal use, facial blotting paper, hair removal wax, emery boards, nail glue, pumice stones for personal use, nail polish remover, and nail buffing preparations, shimmer dust for skin, non-medicated lip balm, lipstick sealer, and sparkle skin gel | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Cosmetic bags sold empty, shoulder bags, and travel bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Makeup brushes, eyebrow and eyelash brushes, nail brushes, facial brushes, cleansing sponges, makeup sponges, powder puffs, mesh sponges, massage and cleansing mitts, cotton ball holders, lipstick holders, makeup applicators, and makeup brush holders | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Aroma therapy, hair removal hair dying, cosmetic makeovers, pedicures, manicures, facials, and body piercing services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FACES INTERNATIONAL SRL
- Other trademarks owned by Faces Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FACES COSMETICS GROUP INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named F FACES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |