USPTO serial 75761727
ESKETCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2834739Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 20, 2004
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ESKETCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAYMOND E ROBERTS
RAYMOND E ROBERTS Patent Venture Group10788 Civic Center Drive, Suite 215Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3805UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTERFACE CONTROLLERS FOR USER INPUT OF DATA INTO ELECTRICAL DEVICES ATTACHED TO AN ELECTRONICS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 3, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 22, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |