USPTO serial 75761807
HTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lawrenceville, NJ
Lawrenceville, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY E. CARROLL
AMY E CARROLL DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NWSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS, NAMELY, LASER-BASED OPTICAL SYSTEMS COMPRISING ONE OR MORE ILLUMINATION SOURCES, NAMELY, ILLUMINATION LASERS, LIGHT-EMITTING DIODES, INCANDESCENT ARC SOURCES AND ONE OR MORE ELECTRONIC DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL IMAGING; LASER CONFOCAL MICROSCOPES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR IMAGE ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL DATA FOR THE DISCOVERY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THERAPEUTICS AND THE DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS RELATING TO THERAPEUTICS AND METHODS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASE USING LASER-BASED OPTICAL SYSTEMS COMPRISING ONE OR MORE ILLUMINATION SOURCES AND ONE OR MORE DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL IMAGING; LASER CONFOCAL MICROSCOPES; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IN THE FIELD OF LIFE SCIENCES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |