USPTO serial 75762267
PUREFOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUREFOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin C. Jones
KEVIN C JONES ASSISTANT SECRETARY & SENIOR ATTORNEYHORMEL FOODS CORPORATION1 HORMEL PLAUSTIN, MN 55912-3680Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fresh or cured pork; beef; processed meats; poultry; sausage; soups and entrees consisting primarily of vegetables and/or meat; chili with beans; beef stew; prepared entrees consisting primarily of beef or pork or poultry or fish and/or vegetables; and meat and poultry stocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | sandwiches consisting of meat, fish, poultry, or egg, and/or cheese, and/or chili sauce, and/or barbecue sauce, with a biscuit, English muffin, bun, bread or batter; corn dogs; tamales; burritos; and prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |