USPTO serial 75763282
EXPLORER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPLORER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ruben C. DeLeon
JEFFREY M BECKER HAYNES AND BOONE, LLPSTE 3100901 MAIN STDALLAS, TX 75202-3789Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Aircraft and Airplanes | ACTIVE | Jul 27, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |