Drawing for THE BUCK STOPS HERE

USPTO serial 75763375

THE BUCK STOPS HERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE BUCK STOPS HERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith D. Moore

Keith D. Moore Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.308 Mallory Station RoadFranklin, TN 37067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MACHINES FOR PLAYING GAMES OF CHANCEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 19, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 6, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance