Drawing for Serial No. 75764599

USPTO serial 75764599

Serial No. 75764599

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2647418Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 5, 2002
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with Serial No. 75764599?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven N. Terranova

Steven N. Terranova Withrow & Terranova, PLLC100 Regency Forest DriveSuite 160Cary, NC 27518

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020STOPPERS OF PLASTIC FOR CONTAINERS FOR LIQUIDSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 24, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 9, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 20, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 13, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 4, 20098.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Feb 3, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 30, 2009ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 4, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 21, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 5, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Aug 27, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 8, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 13, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2001RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 17, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance