USPTO serial 75764691
SPECGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPECGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa-ken, JP
Minato-ku, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD LINN
RICHARD LINN FOLEY & LARDNER3000 K ST STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-1500UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for designing and developing all kinds of electronic devices and computer programs, namely simulators, compilers, debuggers, synthesis tools and utility programs used to formulate and evaluate designs that describe, represent, or characterize computers, electronics equipment, communication equipment, home appliances, and any computing equipment which includes an electronic device and controller consisting of computer program code and or/components, and parts of computer program code and component | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |