USPTO serial 75764697
VISIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vizyon Deri Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi
No: 13/3, Merter. Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by Vizyon Deri Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James T Hosmer
JAMES T HOSMER NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATIONS OF LEATHER AND GOODS MADE OF THESE MATERIALS-- PROCESSED LEATHER AND UNPROCESSED LEATHER, LEATHER USED IN CLOTHING, FURNISHING, BOOKBINDING, SHOEMAKING AND SADDLERY; ANIMAL SKINS AND HIDES; BAGS, SPORT BAGS, BABY CARRY COAT, RUCKSACKS, BEACH BAGS, SHOPPING BAGS, TRUNKS AND TRAVELING BAGS; WALLETS, POCKET WALLETS; UMBRELLAS, PARASOLS AND WALKING STICKS; WHIPS, HARNESS AND SADDLERY | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, FOOTWEAR AND HEADGEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2001 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |